of Siberia and Russian Far East
This study presents etymological deciphering using ancient Japanese ways of reading ancient Chinese scripts of the
names for the five types of stringed instruments, known as komuz, tatonpa, sugut, tambur, and tonkori. Based on the
phonetic variants of the term komuz written in Roman and Russian alphabets and Chinese scripts, two hypothetical
forms *qonbulrsukie and *qonbulrsir were reconstructed: qon ‘sheep’, bulr ‘tendon’, sukie ‘string’, sir ‘string’. As to the form tatonpa, the ancient form *siudonbule {siu ‘boar’ + don ‘gut’ + bule ‘tendon-fiber’} was revealed. The
hypothetical form *siugudi {siu ‘boar’ + gudi ‘gut’} was reconstructed from the phonetic variants of the name sugut, written in Chinese scripts. The hypothetical form *donbule {don ‘gut’ + bule ‘tendon-fiber’} was reconstructed from the phonetic variants of the name tambur written in Chinese scripts. An Ainu word tonkori consists of Altaic root-forms don ‘gut’ and kur ‘string-instrument’, followed by an Ainu suffix {i}
‘that’. We have proved that, except for the Ainu suffix {i}, all the root forms linguistically belong to Altaic lan-
guages. Not a few ethnographers dealt with the etymological analysis of instrument names encountered in Siberia
and the Russian Far East, mainly taking into account the context of shamanism. It is known that shamans used the
instruments as tools in healing rituals. However, contrary to our expectations, the reconstructed root forms of the
names revealed practical aspects of daily life.
Alekseenko E. A. Muzykal’nye instrumenty narodov severa Zapadnoy Sibiri [Musical instruments of the
peoples of the north of Western Siberia] In: Material’naya i dukhovnaya kul’tura narodov Sibiri: Sbornik
Muzeya antropologii i etnografii [Material and spiritual culture of the peoples of Siberia: Collection of the
Museum of Anthropology and Ethnography]. Leningrad, Nauka, 1988, vol. 42, pр. 5–23. (In Russ.).
Basilov V. N. Shamanstvo u narodov Sredney Azii i Kazakhstana [Shamanism among the peoples of Central Asia and Kazakhstan]. Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology named after N. N. Miklouho-Maclay.
Moscow, Nauka, 1992, 328 р. (In Russ.).
Matsuura Takeshiro. Kitaezo-yoshi [Field notes and pictures about the Northern Ezo]. 1860.
URL: https://dl.ndl.go.jp/info:ndljp/pid/2535294 (accessed: 06.04.2021). (In Japan.).
Murase Kotei. Geien Nissho [Daily survey of Sino-Japanese archives]. 1807.
URL: https://kotenseki.nijl.ac.jp/biblio/100239660/viewer/172 (accessed: 06.04.2021). (In Japan.).
Sarybaev B. Sh. Kazakhskie muzykal’nye instrumenty [Kazakh musical instruments]. Alma-Ata, Zhalyn,
1978, 174 р. (In Russ.).
Schchurov V. Guttural Singing of the People of the Sayan-Altai, and Ural Mountains. In: The liner notes
to the CD Uzlyau. 1992. (In Engl.).
Shimomura Isao. Ainu hassei koukin shuzoku-no kenkyu [Study of Ainu’s speaking jew’s-harp rituals].
Kitami, North Academy, 2004, 186 р. (In Japan.).
Sravnitel’nyy slovar’ tunguso-man’chzhurskikh yazykov: Materialy k etimologicheskomu slovaryu [Comparative dictionary of the Tungus-Manchu languages: Materials for the etymological dictionary].
V. I. Tsintsius (Ed.). Leningrad, Nauka, 1975, vol. 1, 672 р. (In Russ.).
Sravnitel’nyy slovar’ tunguso-man’chzhurskikh yazykov: Materialy k etimologicheskomu slovaryu [Comparative dictionary of the Tungus-Manchu languages: Materials for the etymological dictionary].
V. I. Tsintsius (Ed.). Leningrad, Nauka, 1977, vol. 2, 992 р. (In Russ.).
Vasil’ev V. E. Genezis shamanskikh instrumentov naroda sakha v svete obraza materi-zverya u tyurkov,
mongolov i tungusov [Genesis of shamanic instruments of the Sakha people in the light of the image of the
mother beast among the Turks, Mongols and Tungus]. Severo-Vostochnyy gumanitarnyy vestnik. 2016, no. 4,
pр. 18–27. (In Russ.).
Xue Zong Ming. Zhongguo yinyue shi [History of Chinese Music]. 2003, vol. 2.
URL: books.google.co.jp/books?id=CBZ-cdKv36sC&pg=PP297&虎撥思#v=onepage&q=虎撥思&f=false
(accessed 20.02.2021). (In Chinese).
of Siberia and Russian Far East // Языки и фольклор коренных народов Сибири. 2021. № 1. Pp. 47–58. DOI: 10.25205/2312-6337-2021-1-47-58.