Grammaticalized sensory evidence as typological peculiarity of the North Asian languages

In the section Морфология
Grammaticalized sensory evidence as typological peculiarity of the North Asian languages
Авторы (текстом)
L. A. Ilyina
Institute of Philology of the SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
Ключевые слова
grammaticalized sensory evidence, Northern Asia languages, Samoyedic and Yukaghir languages, opposition of visible and non-visible situations
Abstract

The paper defines a semantic zone of non-visual sensory evidence, grammaticalized in the verbal system, as “sensory
evidence.” Sensory evidence grammaticalized in the verbal system is rare in contemporary languages. It is likely to be
found in languages that are or were used in the recent past traditional cultures of ancient origin. Many Eurasian languages have evidential grammatical verbal forms, with most not having sensory evidential forms. Such verbal forms
were known as auditive in Eurasia only in four Samoyedic languages: Nenets, Enets, Nganasan, and Selkup. Recently,
the traditional Yukaghir folklore archaic texts collected by V. I. Jochelson in the late 19th – early 20th centuries revealed
similar grammatical and semantic analog of Samoyedic auditive, suggesting sensory evidential verbal grammemes to be
more widespread in the past in the languages of aboriginal Northern Asia peoples, in diachronic retrospective. Our main
goal was to identify the inter-disciplinary evidence of diachronically earlier communicative functions and meanings of
Northern Asian sensory evidential verbal forms. These functions and meanings are most informatively presented in the
archaic texts of Nenets traditional folklore, especially shaman songs and heroic epos. The paper proves basic semantics
of the Northern Samoyedic sensory evidential grammemes to refer to the auditive perception of non-visible situations
(events). Thus, non-visible events were opposed grammatically to visual situations by verbal forms concerned. Considering historical ethnology data in an interdisciplinary way, the author explains the fact above as a grammaticalized language replica of fundamental mental opposition of ancient mythological thinking – the opposition of visible and non-visible situations.

Bibliography

Aikhenvald A. Y. Evidentiality. Oxford, Oxford U. Press, 2004.

Iokhel’son V. I. Materialy po izucheniyu yukagirskogo yazyka i fol’klora, sobrannye v Kolymskom okruge.
Ch. 1 [Materials on the study of the Yukagir language and folklore, collected in the Kolyma district. Pt. 1]. St.
Petersburg, Izd. Imp. Akad. nauk, 1900, 240 p. (In Russ.).

Iokhel’son V. I. Unanganskiy (aleutskiy) yazyk [Unangan (Aleut) Language]. In: Yazyki i pis’mennost’
narodov Severa. Ch. 3 [Languages and writing of the peoples of the North. Pt. 3]. Moscow, Leningrad, Gosuchpedgiz, 1934, pp. 129–14. (In Russ.).

Il’ina L. A. Samodiyskaya glagol’naya grammema auditiva i ee yukagirskiy analog [Samoyedic verbal
grammeme with auditive meaning and its Youkaghir analogue]. In: Materialy 3 Mezhdunar. nauch.konf. po
samodistike, Institut filologii SO RAN, 26–28 oktyabrya 2010g. [Materials of the 3rd International conference on
Samoyedic Studies, Institute of Philology, SB RAS, 26–28 Oct. 2010.] S. I. Burkova (Ed.). Novosibirsk, 2010,
Lyubava, pp. 99–106. (In Russ.).

Il’ina L. A. K probleme sotsiokul’turnoy determinatsii evidential’nykh grammem i oppozitsiy v yazykakh
Severnoy Azii [Towards the problem of socio-cultural determination of evidential grammemes and oppositions
in Northern Asian languages]. Languages and Folklore of Indigenous Peoples of Siberia. 2016, iss. 30, pp. 21–
29. (In Russ.).

Kupriyanova Z. N. Epicheskie pesni nentsev [Epic songs of the Nenets]. Moscow, Nauka, 1965, 782 p. (In
Russ.).

Kuznetsova A. I., Kazakevich O. A., Ioffe L. Yu. Khelimskiy E. A. Ocherki po sel’kupskomu yazyku. Tazovskiy dialekt [Essays on the Selkup language. Taz dialect]. Мoscow, МSU, 1993, 196 p. (In Russ.).

Kuznetsova A. I., Khelimskiy E. A., Grushkina E. V. Ocherki po sel’kupskomu yazyku. Tazovskiy dialekt
[Essays on the Selkup language (Taz dialect)]. Moscow, Nauka, 1980, 411 p. (In Russ.).

Lehtisalo T. Juraksamojedishe Volksdichtung. Helsinki, 1947, 615 p.

Levi-Strauss C. Strukturnaya antropologiya [Structural Antropology]. Moscow, Nauka, 1983, 536 p. (In
Russ.).

Meletinskiy E. M. Mifologiya i fol’klor v trudakh Levi-Strosa [Mythology and Folklore in Levi-Straus’s
Works]. In: Levi-Strauss C. Strukturnaya antropologiya [Structural anthropology]. Moscow, Nauka, 1983, pp.
467–522. (In Russ.).

Nenetskiy fol’klor [Nenetz folklore]. Leningrad, Uchpedgiz, 1960, 293 p. (In Russ.).

Nenetskiy fol’klor. Mify, skazki, istoricheskie predaniya [Nenetz folklore. Myths, tales, historical legends].
Krasnoyarsk, 1995, 222 pp. (In Russ.).

Plungyan V. A. Obshchaya morfologiya: Vvedenie v problematiku [General morphology: An introduction into problem issues]. Moscow, Editorial URSS, 2000, 384 p. (In Russ.).

Plungyan V. A. Vvedenie v grammaticheskuyu semantiku: grammaticheskie znacheniya i grammaticheskie
sistemy yazykov mira [The introduction into grammatical systems of the world’s languages]. Moscow, RSUH,
2011, 672 p. (In Russ.).

Tereshchenko N. M. Nenetskiy epos. Materialy i issledovaniya po samodiyskim yazykam [Nenets epos. Materials and Research in of the Samoyedic language]. Leningrad, Nauka, 1990, 336 p. (In Russ.).

Willet Th. A cross-linguistic survey of the grammaticization of evidentiality. Studies in Language. 1988, vol.
12, no. 1.

Bibliographic reference
L. A. Ilyina Grammaticalized sensory evidence as typological peculiarity of the North Asian languages // Языки и фольклор коренных народов Сибири. 2020. № 2. Pp. 78–88. DOI: 10.25205/2312-6337-2020-2-78-88.